Media Contact

Contact: Lynette Kalsnes, ACLU-MN communications director, 612-270-8531, lkalsnes@aclu-mn.org

MINNEAPOLIS – The ACLU of Minnesota today won a partial summary judgment finding that Anoka County Jail discriminates against people on the basis of national origin, violating the 14th Amendment right to equal protection.

The jail contacts ICE anytime someone who is foreign-born is brought to jail, regardless of citizenship or immigration status. “… The policy in question facially discriminates on the basis of national origin and is not narrowly tailored,” wrote Chief Judge John Tunheim of the U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota.

The ACLU-MN sued on behalf of Myriam Parada, who was rear-ended while driving her siblings home from a birthday party. Coon Rapids Police Officer Nicolas Oman let the other driver go, and instead arrested and jailed Parada. The officer said he couldn’t identify Myriam, despite her Matricula Consular card, proof of insurance, and her stepfather arriving to vouch for her. The jail booked her and then held her for four more hours for ICE, long after jail records suggest Parada should have been released.

“… A reasonable jury could conclude Anoka County deputies slow-walked Parada’s release based solely on their interactions with ICE, which occurred solely because Parada was foreign-born,” Chief Judge Tunheim wrote.

“Coon Rapids police should not have targeted and arrested Myriam simply for being Latina, and the Anoka jail should not have violated her rights even further by holding her for ICE based on where she was born,” said ACLU-MN Staff Attorney Ian Bratlie. “The judge’s ruling today means this discriminatory and unconstitutional policy based on national origin will not stand.”

Both sides had argued for summary judgment on multiple counts. Judge Tunheim denied summary judgment to Officer Oman on the claim that he violated Parada’s equal protection rights, given evidence that Oman posted anti-immigrant messages on his Facebook page and chose not to arrest several non-Latino motorists who drove without a license. The judge allowed several other ACLU-MN claims to move forward. A jury will decide whether the Anoka County sheriff is entitled to qualified immunity, and several state law claims.

“We look forward to vindicating Myriam’s constitutional rights before a jury and are deeply gratified by Judge Tunheim’s decision” said Alain Baudry of Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP.

Attorneys in the case include lead partner Alain Baudry of Saul Ewing; Amanda Cefalu and Nathan Boone of Kutak Rock LLP; and Ian Bratlie and Teresa Nelson of the ACLU-MN.

Related Content

Press Release
Dec 05, 2022
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Appeals Court Upholds Verdict Against Anoka County for False Imprisonment

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Wednesday upheld a lower-court ruling that Anoka County’s policy of contacting ICE about every foreign-born person the county jailed was a “classic example of national-origin discrimination.”
Court Cases: Parada v. Anoka County
Press Release
Jan 28, 2021
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights

JURY FINDS ANOKA COUNTY JAIL COMMITTED FALSE IMPRISONMENT 

In the first virtual federal jury trial in Minnesota, a jury Thursday found that Anoka County and its sheriff falsely imprisoned a young woman by slow-walking her booking and following an unwritten and unconstitutional policy of contacting ICE about people born outside the U.S.
Issue Areas: Immigrants' Rights
Court Cases: Parada v. Anoka County